Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate constants for the Karvonen and heart rate reserve formulas corresponding to the anaerobic threshold to conveniently estimate exercise therapy intensity in nonbeta-blocked hemodialysis patients.
Do the Karvonen and HRR formulas accurately predict a target exercise heart rate corresponding to the anaerobic threshold in nonbeta-blocked hemodialysis patients?
Do the Karvonen and HRR formulas accurately predict a target exercise heart rate corresponding to the anaerobic threshold in nonbeta-blocked hemodialysis patients?
The Karvonen and HRR formulas with specific constants (k=0.24, α=17) provide a simple and reliable method to estimate target exercise heart rate at the anaerobic threshold for nonbeta-blocked hemodialysis patients.
May support target HR estimation at anaerobic threshold in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
The aim of this study was to evaluate constants of the Karvonen (k) and heart rate reserve (HRR) (α) formulas that correspond to the anaerobic threshold (AT) to conveniently estimate the intensity of exercise therapy in nonbeta-blocked patients undergoing hemodialysis. Twenty-three patients undergoing hemodialysis performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and their HR at AT was measured. The predictor coefficients for a target HR corresponding to AT were calculated for each patient based on CPX. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate the reliability of the formulas. Mean values of coefficient k of the Karvonen formula and α of the HRR formula were 0.24 ± 0.11 and 17.4 ± 8, respectively. The target HR calculated with k = 0.24 and α = 17 had significant ICC between HR at AT (0.74 and 0.77, respectively; P < 0.05). Using the Karvonen and HRR formulas to determine a target HR corresponding to AT is a simple and easy method that can be used to develop exercise programs for hemodialysis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yabe et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: