Why the study?
Target heart rate at anaerobic threshold via CPX is recommended for exercise prescription after MI, but using percent heart rate reserve is difficult in patients taking β-blockers when CPX cannot be performed.
Does a new formula using resting variables accurately predict heart rate at anaerobic threshold in MI patients regardless of beta-blocker treatment status?
Does a new formula using resting variables accurately predict heart rate at anaerobic threshold in MI patients regardless of beta-blocker treatment status?
A new formula using resting variables accurately predicts heart rate at anaerobic threshold in MI patients, offering a practical method for exercise prescription when cardiopulmonary exercise testing is unavailable.
New β-blocker-adjusted HRAT formula may aid exercise prescription post-MI without CPX; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
PURPOSE: It is recommended that patients with myocardial infarction (MI) be prescribed exercise by target heart rate (HR) at the anaerobic threshold (AT) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). Although percent HR reserve using predicted HRmax (%HRRpred) is used to prescribe exercise if CPX or an exercise test cannot be performed, %HRRpred is especially difficult to use when patients take β-blockers. We devised a new formula to predict HR at AT (HRAT) that considers β-blocker effects in MI patients and validated its accuracy. METHODS: The new formula was created using the data of 196 MI patients in our hospital (derivation sample), and its accuracy was assessed using the data of 71 MI patients in other hospitals (validation sample). All patients underwent CPX 1 mo after MI onset, and resting HR, resting systolic blood pressure (SBP), and HRAT were measured during CPX. RESULTS: The results of multiple regression analysis in the derivation sample gave the following formula (R2 = 0.605, P < .001): predicted HRAT = 2.035 × (≥65 yr:-1, <65 yr:1) + 3.648 × (body mass index <18.5 kg/m2:-1, body mass index ≥18.5 kg/m2:1) + 4.284 × (β1-blocker(+):-1, β1-blocker(-):1) + 0.734 × (HRrest) + 0.078 × (SBPrest) + 36.812. This formula consists entirely of predictors that can be obtained at rest. HRAT and predicted HRAT with the new formula were not significantly different in the validation sample (mean absolute error: 5.5 ± 4.1 bpm). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the new formula appeared to be favorable. This new formula may be a practical method for exercise prescription in MI patients, regardless of their β-blocker treatment status, if CPX is unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemoto et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: