Key result
A derived equation for predicting maximal heart rate in heart failure patients on beta-blockers outperformed the 220-age formula (R2 0.28 vs -2.93; SEE 18 vs 43 beats/min).
Why the study?
Does a derived simplified equation improve the prediction of maximal heart rate compared to the 220 - age equation in patients with systolic heart failure on beta-blocker therapy?
Observational
Does a derived simplified equation improve the prediction of maximal heart rate compared to the 220 - age equation in patients with systolic heart failure on beta-blocker therapy?
A newly derived equation provides a more accurate estimation of maximal heart rate than the traditional 220-age formula in systolic heart failure patients on beta-blockers, though its variation limits utility for prescribing precise exercise intensity.
PURPOSE: Standards for estimating maximal HR are important when interpreting the adequacy of physiologic stress during exercise testing, assessing chronotropic response, and prescribing an exercise training regimen. The equation 220 - age is used to estimate maximum HR; however, it overestimates measured maximal HR in patients taking β-adrenergic blockade (βB) therapy. This study developed and validated a practical equation to predict maximal HR in patients with heart failure (HF) taking βB therapy. METHODS: Data from symptom-limited exercise tests completed on patients with systolic HF participating in the Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training trial and taking a βB agent were used to develop a simplified equation, which was validated using bootstrapping. RESULTS: The simplified derived equation was 119 + 0.5 (resting HR) - 0.5 (age) - (0, if test was completed using a treadmill; 5, if using a stationary bike). The R2 and SEE were 0.28 and 18 beats·min(-1), respectively. Validation of this equation yielded a mean R and SEE of 0.28 and 18 beats·min(-1), respectively. For the equation 220 - age, the R2 was -2.93, and the SEE was 43 beats·min(-1). CONCLUSIONS: We report a valid and simple population-specific equation for estimating peak HR in patients with HF taking βB therapy. This equation should be helpful when evaluating chronotropic response or assessing if a maximum effort was provided during exercise testing. We caution, however, that the magnitude of the variation (SEE = 18 beats·min(-1)) associated with this prediction equation may make it impractical when prescribing exercise intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keteyian et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Systolic heart failure. Derived maximal HR prediction equation vs. 220 - age equation was evaluated on Maximal heart rate prediction accuracy (R2 and SEE). A derived equation for predicting maximal heart rate in heart failure patients on beta-blockers outperformed the 220-age formula (R2 0.28 vs -2.93; SEE 18 vs 43 beats/min).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: