Key result
Continuing beta-blocker therapy on test day significantly lowered achieved maximal heart rate compared to holding or not taking beta-blockers, yielding a derived HRmax equation of 168 - 0.51 × age.
Why the study?
Does beta-blocker therapy status affect maximal heart rate prediction equations in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=337)
Does beta-blocker therapy status affect maximal heart rate prediction equations in patients with coronary artery disease?
For CAD patients holding beta-blocker therapy on test day, HRmax estimation equations similar to those for patients never on beta-blockers can be used, whereas those taking beta-blockers require a specific equation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Beta-blocker status warrants adjusted HRmax equations in CAD exercise testing; extends general equations but leaves prospective validation open.
PURPOSE: To derive specific maximal heart rate (HRmax) prediction equations for a coronary artery disease (CAD) population based upon status of β-blocker (BB) therapy and to compare these to prior HRmax equations (Fox and Brawner-specific for CAD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed stress echocardiogram treadmill tests in patients with CAD, dividing subjects into 3 groups based upon BB use on test day: not prescribed BB therapy (no BB group; n = 110); held for 12 to 24 hr prior (held BB group; n = 155); and continued taking (took BB group; n = 72). RESULTS: Derived HRmax equations for our CAD population were no BB = 200 - 0.79 × age; held BB = 193 - 0.71 × age; and took BB = 168 - 0.51 × age. Achieved HRmax mean was not significantly different between held BB and no BB groups; however, HRmax in the took BB group was significantly lower. Fox and Brawner (no BB)-HRmax equations significantly overestimated (+6 and +9 mean bias) and underestimated (-8 and -6 mean bias) achieved HRmax in no BB and held BB groups, respectively. The Brawner (no BB) equation intercept and slope were not significantly different from our CAD-held BB and no BB equations. The Brawner (on BB) equation intercept and slope were similar to our took BB equation, but greatly underestimated achieved HRmax (-17 mean bias). CONCLUSION: For patients holding BB therapy on test day, a similar CAD HRmax estimation equation to those patients never on BB can be used, comparable to the Brawner (no BB) equation. Further research is needed to determine when patients should take their BB therapy in conjunction with exercise testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godlasky et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=337). Beta-blocker therapy vs. No beta-blocker therapy or held beta-blocker therapy was evaluated on Maximal heart rate (HRmax). Continuing beta-blocker therapy on test day significantly lowered achieved maximal heart rate compared to holding or not taking beta-blockers, yielding a derived HRmax equation of 168 - 0.51 × age.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: