Key result
Despite 75.1% of stable coronary artery disease patients receiving beta-blockers, 41.1% of treated patients maintained a resting heart rate ≥70 bpm, which was independently associated with more frequent angina and ischemia.
Observational (n=33,438)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 41.1% vs 52.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
Despite high rates of beta-blocker use, a large proportion of stable CAD patients have a resting heart rate ≥ 70 bpm, which correlates with worse angina and ischemia.
Despite beta-blocker use, resting heart rate ≥70 bpm associates with more angina in stable CAD; leaves open whether stricter control improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) is an emerging risk factor in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is little contemporary data regarding HR and the use of HR-lowering medications, particularly beta-blockers, among patients with stable CAD in routine clinical practice. The goal of the present analysis was to describe HR in such patients, overall and in relation to beta-blocker use, and to describe the determinants of HR. METHODS AND FINDINGS: CLARIFY is an international, prospective, observational, longitudinal registry of outpatients with stable CAD, defined as prior myocardial infarction or revascularization procedure, evidence of coronary stenosis of >50%, or chest pain associated with proven myocardial ischemia. A total of 33,438 patients from 45 countries in Europe, the Americas, Africa, Middle East, and Asia/Pacific were enrolled between November 2009 and July 2010. Most of the 33,177 patients included in this analysis were men (77.5%). Mean (SD) age was 64.2 (10.5) years, HR by pulse was 68.3 (10.6) bpm, and by electrocardiogram was 67.2 (11.4) bpm. Overall, 44.0% had HR ≥ 70 bpm. Beta-blockers were used in 75.1% of patients and another 14.4% had intolerance or contraindications to beta-blocker therapy. Among 24,910 patients on beta-blockers, 41.1% had HR ≥ 70 bpm. HR ≥ 70 bpm was independently associated with higher prevalence and severity of angina, more frequent evidence of myocardial ischemia, and lack of use of HR-lowering agents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high rate of use of beta-blockers, stable CAD patients often have resting HR ≥ 70 bpm, which was associated with an overall worse health status, more frequent angina and ischemia. Further HR lowering is possible in many patients with CAD. Whether it will improve symptoms and outcomes is being tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steg et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=33,438). Beta-blocker therapy vs. No beta-blocker therapy was evaluated on Resting heart rate ≥70 bpm (p=<0.001). Despite 75.1% of stable coronary artery disease patients receiving beta-blockers, 41.1% of treated patients maintained a resting heart rate ≥70 bpm, which was independently associated with more frequent angina and ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: