Key result
A new formula using resting parameters accurately predicted heart rate at anaerobic threshold in myocardial infarction patients, with a mean absolute error of 5.5 ± 4.1 bpm in the validation cohort.
Why the study?
Using predicted heart rate reserve to prescribe exercise when cardiopulmonary exercise testing cannot be performed is difficult in myocardial infarction patients taking β-blockers.
Can a new formula using resting variables accurately predict heart rate at anaerobic threshold in patients with myocardial infarction, including those taking beta-blockers?
Observational (n=267)
Yes
Can a new formula using resting variables accurately predict heart rate at anaerobic threshold in patients with myocardial infarction, including those taking beta-blockers?
Effect estimate: R2 = 0.605; mean absolute error: 5.5 ± 4.1 bpm
p-value: p=<.001
A newly derived formula using simple resting variables can accurately predict heart rate at the anaerobic threshold for exercise prescription in post-MI patients, including those on beta-blockers, when cardiopulmonary exercise testing is unavailable.
Facilitates individualized exercise prescription in post-MI rehab without maximal testing; extends resting-parameter models with RCT validation.
Purpose: It is recommended that patients with myocardial infarction (MI) be prescribed exercise by target heart rate (HR) at the anaerobic threshold (AT) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). Although percent HR reserve using predicted HR max (%HRR pred ) is used to prescribe exercise if CPX or an exercise test cannot be performed, %HRR pred is especially difficult to use when patients take β-blockers. We devised a new formula to predict HR at AT (HR AT ) that considers β-blocker effects in MI patients and validated its accuracy. Methods: The new formula was created using the data of 196 MI patients in our hospital (derivation sample), and its accuracy was assessed using the data of 71 MI patients in other hospitals (validation sample). All patients underwent CPX 1 mo after MI onset, and resting HR, resting systolic blood pressure (SBP), and HR AT were measured during CPX. Results: The results of multiple regression analysis in the derivation sample gave the following formula ( R 2 = 0.605, P < .001): predicted HR AT = 2.035 × (≥65 yr:−1, <65 yr:1) + 3.648 × (body mass index <18.5 kg/m 2 :−1, body mass index ≥18.5 kg/m 2 :1) + 4.284 × ( β 1-blocker(+):−1, β 1-blocker(−):1) + 0.734 × (HR rest ) + 0.078 × (SBP rest ) + 36.812. This formula consists entirely of predictors that can be obtained at rest. HR AT and predicted HR AT with the new formula were not significantly different in the validation sample (mean absolute error: 5.5 ± 4.1 bpm). Conclusions: The accuracy of the new formula appeared to be favorable. This new formula may be a practical method for exercise prescription in MI patients, regardless of their β-blocker treatment status, if CPX is unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemoto et al. (2021) conducted an observational in myocardial infarction (n=267). New formula to predict heart rate at anaerobic threshold vs. Measured heart rate at anaerobic threshold via cardiopulmonary exercise testing was evaluated on Predicted heart rate at anaerobic threshold (HR AT) (R2 = 0.605; mean absolute error: 5.5 ± 4.1 bpm, p=<.001). A new formula using resting parameters accurately predicted heart rate at anaerobic threshold in myocardial infarction patients, with a mean absolute error of 5.5 ± 4.1 bpm in the validation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: