PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 2022Scientific Reports51 citationsOpen Access

Deep learning segmentation and quantification method for assessing epicardial adipose tissue in CT calcium score scans

AHAmmar HooriTHTao HuJLJu-Hwan Lee

Structured PICO

Does a deep learning method (DeepFat) accurately segment and quantify epicardial adipose tissue on CT calcium score scans compared to manual segmentation?

P
Population
Non-contrast low-dose CT calcium score images
I
Intervention
Deep learning method (DeepFat) for automatic assessment of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) using HU-attention-window and look ahead slab-of-slices with bisection
C
Comparator
Manual segmentation
O
Outcome
Accuracy of EAT volume quantification (volume Dice, slice Dice, EAT error, and correlation R)surrogate

The DeepFat deep learning algorithm provides accurate, automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue on non-contrast CT calcium score scans, with performance comparable to manual segmentation.

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue volume (EAT) has been linked to coronary artery disease and the risk of major adverse cardiac events. As manual quantification of EAT is time-consuming, requires specialized training, and is prone to human error, we developed a deep learning method (DeepFat) for the automatic assessment of EAT on non-contrast low-dose CT calcium score images. Our DeepFat intuitively segmented the tissue enclosed by the pericardial sac on axial slices, using two preprocessing steps. First, we applied a HU-attention-window with a window/level 350/40-HU to draw attention to the sac and reduce numerical errors. Second, we applied a novel look ahead slab-of-slices with bisection ("bisect") in which we split the heart into halves and sequenced the lower half from bottom-to-middle and the upper half from top-to-middle, thereby presenting an always increasing curvature of the sac to the network. EAT volume was obtained by thresholding voxels within the sac in the fat window (- 190/- 30-HU). Compared to manual segmentation, our algorithm gave excellent results with volume Dice = 88.52% ± 3.3, slice Dice = 87.70% ± 7.5, EAT error = 0.5% ± 8.1, and R = 98.52% (p < 0.001). HU-attention-window and bisect improved Dice volume scores by 0.49% and 3.2% absolute, respectively. Variability between analysts was comparable to variability with DeepFat. Results compared favorably to those of previous publications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoori et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d57320994d36ef590c9ec2https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06351-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper