Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we show how MCC produces a more informative and truthful score in evaluating binary classifications than accuracy and F₁ score, by first explaining the mathematical properties, and then the asset of MCC in six synthetic use cases and in a real genomics scenario. We believe that the Matthews correlation coefficient should be preferred to accuracy and F₁ score in evaluating binary classification tasks by all scientific communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chicco et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: