Retrospective evaluation finds CALLY index predicts postoperative fever and SIRS, suggesting a new risk assessment tool.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, along with other inflammatory and nutritional markers, for early postoperative fever and its progression to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 293 patients who underwent PCNL with sterile preoperative urine cultures. Postoperative fever was defined as an axillary temperature of ≥38 ℃, and SIRS was defined as the presence of two or more criteria within 48 hours post-PCNL. Preoperative inflammatory and CALLY indices were calculated. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used for predictive values. Results: Of the 293 patients, 65 (22.2%) developed postoperative fever. Among the febrile patients, 31 (47.7%) had SIRS. Multivariate analysis identified CALLY as the sole independent predictor of both postoperative fever in the whole cohort (odds ratio=0.434, p=0.002) and SIRS in febrile patients (odds ratio=0.079, p=0.031). Higher CALLY scores were associated with lower odds of developing complications in the study population. CALLY demonstrated good discriminatory ability for postoperative fever (area under the curve=0.823; cutoff ≤1.365, sensitivity of 81.54%, specificity of 67.11%) and SIRS (area under the curve=0.757; cutoff ≤0.705, sensitivity of 83.87%, specificity of 64.71%). Conclusion: The preoperative CALLY index is a novel and independent predictor of both early postoperative fever and SIRS following PCNL in patients with sterile preoperative urine. Its nature of integrating nutritional status, immune response, and inflammation, provides a valuable tool for risk stratification, guiding individualised monitoring and timely intervention strategies following PCNL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köse et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: