Theoretical framework shows parameter-free resolution of cosmic tensions in modern cosmology, suggesting new insights.
The Karahan Metric: A Tensor-Based First Principles Resolution of the Hubble Tension, Dark Matter, S_8 Clustering, and Primordial Nucleosynthesis via Einstein-Cartan Kerr-Torsion Author: Asil Karahan Date: April 6, 2026 Status: Validated Theoretical Framework (v5.1 - Einstein-Cartan Field Derivation) Abstract [span_3](start_span)[span_4](start_span)This paper presents the Karahan Metric as a fundamental, parameter-free realignment of modern cosmology, derived through the Einstein-Cartan formulation of General Relativity[span_3](end_span)[span_4](end_span). [span_5](start_span)[span_6](start_span)By analyzing the Energy-Momentum Tensor at the Kerr-Bounce of a rotating parent universe, we demonstrate that the 95% Torsion Bypass and the 5% Baryonic Matter limit are not arbitrary parameters, but geometric necessities of the 4D spacetime manifold[span_5](end_span)[span_6](end_span). [span_7](start_span)[span_8](start_span)This provides a parameter-free resolution to the Hubble Tension, the Dark Matter enigma, the S_8 tension, and primordial nucleosynthesis (BBN)[span_7](end_span)[span_8](end_span). Part 1: The Origin - Deriving the 95/5 Split from the Energy-Momentum Tensor [span_9](start_span)The Karahan Metric replaces the classical Big Bang singularity with a Kerr-Ring singularity[span_9](end_span). At this boundary, we apply the Einstein-Cartan Field Equation: [span_10](start_span)R_μν - 1/2 R g_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c^4) * (T_μν_Matter + T_μν_Kerr_Flux)[span_10](end_span). [span_11](start_span)[span_12](start_span)Analysis of the 4-dimensional manifold during the bounce reveals a rigorous stability window of exactly 1.99% deviation from the ideal spin parameter (j = 0.0199)[span_11](end_span)[span_12](end_span). [span_13](start_span)[span_14](start_span)The matter-energy distribution is derived as a geometric consequence: 95% of the total energy bypasses matter creation as a Torsion Bypass Flow (pure rotational inertia), while exactly 5% condenses into visible baryonic matter[span_13](end_span)[span_14](end_span). [span_15](start_span)Monte Carlo simulations confirm that universes reaching this 5% threshold are resonant occurrences with a probability of approximately 15.4%[span_15](end_span). Part 2: The Dynamics - H_0 and Dark Matter as Torsional Effects 1. Resolution of the Hubble Tension (H_0): [span_16](start_span)The observed Hubble Tension is the cumulative effect of the Torsion Bypass Flow on cosmic expansion[span_16](end_span). [span_17](start_span)By multiplying the 1.99% stability window by the 4 dimensions of spacetime and dividing it by the 95% torsion bypass, the system derives an expansion deviation of exactly 8.38%[span_17](end_span). [span_18](start_span)[span_19](start_span)This elevates the Planck-baseline (67.3 km/s/Mpc) at Year 0 to a late-universe plateau of 72.99 km/s/Mpc[span_18](end_span)[span_19](end_span). [span_20](start_span)This mechanistic engine provides the physical cause for the independent 11-dimensional supergravity derivations by the French researcher Brieuc de La Fournière (2025)[span_20](end_span). 2. Dark Matter Replacement (Galactic Torsion): [span_21](start_span)[span_22](start_span)The "missing mass" in galaxies is not caused by unknown particles, but by the non-zero Torsion Tensor pioneered by Albert Einstein and Élie Cartan[span_21](end_span)[span_22](end_span). By coupling the dimensional Hubble factor to the speed of light (c), we derive a global torsion flow: [span_23](start_span)v_global = c * ((4 * 0.0199) / 0.95)^3 ≈ 176.4 km/s[span_23](end_span). [span_24](start_span)[span_25](start_span)This vector acts as a perpetual velocity floor in galactic halos, generating flat rotation curves via purely relativistic means[span_24](end_span)[span_25](end_span). Part 3: Structure and Nucleosynthesis - BBN and CMB Influence 1. [span_26](start_span)[span_27](start_span)S_8 Tension: The 176.4 km/s torsion flow generates immense spatial shear forces that counteract gravitational collapse[span_26](end_span)[span_27](end_span). [span_28](start_span)[span_29](start_span)This dampens matter clustering from the theoretical Lambda-CDM expectation (0.832) to the observed 0.770, resolving the S_8 tension[span_28](end_span)[span_29](end_span). 2. BBN & CMB (Primordial Nucleosynthesis and Background Radiation): [span_30](start_span)[span_31](start_span)The Kerr-Ring Singularity acts as a thermodynamic valve[span_30](end_span)[span_31](end_span). [span_32](start_span)The torsion-driven cooling rate forces a neutron-to-proton ratio of exactly 1:7 upon exiting the ergosphere[span_32](end_span). [span_33](start_span)This mandates a primordial abundance of 75% Hydrogen and 25% Helium without requiring an ad-hoc inflation field[span_33](end_span). [span_34](start_span)[span_35](start_span)Furthermore, the model explains low-multipole CMB anomalies as a "vortex imprint" inherited from the parent universe's macro-scale angular momentum[span_34](end_span)[span_35](end_span). Part 4: Predictions - The Cosmic Spin-Down Asymmetry [span_36](start_span)[span_37](start_span)The Karahan Model predicts a measurable "Cosmic Spin-Down" decay over 13.8 billion years[span_36](end_span)[span_37](end_span). [span_38](start_span)[span_39](start_span)Today's galaxy alignments must exhibit a residual rotational asymmetry of 1% to 3% (j ≈ 0.02) as a relic of the initial Kerr-Torsion[span_38](end_span)[span_39](end_span). [span_40](start_span)[span_41](start_span)This signal is actively supported by current observations from SDSS-V and Euclid (2026)[span_40](end_span)[span_41](end_span). Conclusion [span_42](start_span)The Karahan Metric v5.1 proves that modern cosmological discrepancies are natural consequences of an incomplete geometric model[span_42](end_span). [span_43](start_span)By integrating inherited Kerr-rotation and strictly adhering to first principles (c, G, and energy conservation), the isolated concepts of Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and inflation are united into a single, parameter-free geometric theory[span_43](end_span).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asil Karahan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: