An investigation of solubility behaviors in solvents for ligand complexes, suggesting optimal solvent choices.
The dissolution behavior of Schiff base ligand LH2(1) and its Ti(IV) and Zr(IV) complexes L2Ti(2) and L2Zr(3) was systematically investigated in five pure solvents (tetrahydrofuran, acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, toluene) from 278.15 to 308.15 K. All compounds showed positive temperature-dependent solubility. The key novelty is revealing that despite structural analogy, Ti(IV) and Zr(IV) complexes exhibit fundamentally different solvation mechanisms driven by ionic radius disparity (Ti4+: 0.605 Å; Zr4+: 0.72 Å). A dual-mechanism model is proposed: for L2Ti(2), the smaller Ti4+ creates a congested coordination sphere, rendering solubility sterically controlled with optimal performance in acetone; for L2Zr(3), the larger Zr4+ establishes an open coordination environment, shifting the mechanism to coordination strength control with tetrahydrofuran as the preferred solvent. These mechanisms are corroborated by Hansen solubility parameters, Gutmann donor numbers, molecular electrostatic potential analysis, and Hirshfeld surface analysis, the latter revealing reduced H···H contacts (41.5%) for L2Ti(2) and diagnostic Zr···O contacts (0.6%) for L2Zr(3). Seven thermodynamic models were applied, with the Wilson model best fitting LH2(1) (ARD = 0.722%), while polynomial and Yaws models performed best for the complexes, reflecting their more complex dissolution behavior. This work provides a predictive basis for rational solvent selection in catalytic and crystallization processes, bridging fundamental coordination chemistry with industrial applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: