Why the study?
Public electrocardiography datasets miss important derived ECG features that form the basis of automatic ECG analysis algorithms and cardiologists' decision processes, as these features are typically restricted to commercial software.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Comparison
ECG features from two commercial algorithms and an open-source implementation vs commercial automatic diagnostic statements
Design
Technical validation and dataset descriptor
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning (ML) methods for the analysis of electrocardiography (ECG) data are gaining importance, substantially supported by the release of large public datasets. However, these current datasets miss important derived descriptors such as ECG features that have been devised in the past hundred years and still form the basis of most automatic ECG analysis algorithms and are critical for cardiologists' decision processes. ECG features are available from sophisticated commercial software but are not accessible to the general public. To alleviate this issue, we add ECG features from two leading commercial algorithms and an open-source implementation supplemented by a set of automatic diagnostic statements from a commercial ECG analysis software in preprocessed format. This allows the comparison of ML models trained on clinically versus automatically generated label sets. We provide an extensive technical validation of features and diagnostic statements for ML applications. We believe this release crucially enhances the usability of the PTB-XL dataset as a reference dataset for ML methods in the context of ECG data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strodthoff et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: