Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conformal loop ensembles (CLEs) are random collections of loops in a simply connected domain, whose laws are characterized by a natural conformal invariance property. The set of points not surrounded by any loop is a canonical random connected fractal set — a random and conformally invariant analog of the Sierpinski carpet or gasket. In the present paper, we derive a direct relationship between the CLEs with simple loops ( CLE_[STIX]x1D705 for [STIX]x1D705∈ (8/3,4) , whose loops are Schramm’s SLE_[STIX]x1D705 -type curves) and the corresponding CLEs with nonsimple loops ( CLE_[STIX]x1D705 with [STIX]x1D705:=16/[STIX]x1D705∈ (4,6) , whose loops are SLE_[STIX]x1D705 -type curves). This correspondence is the continuum analog of the Edwards–Sokal coupling between the q -state Potts model and the associated FK random cluster model, and its generalization to noninteger q . Like its discrete analog, our continuum correspondence has two directions. First, we show that for each [STIX]x1D705∈ (8/3,4) , one can construct a variant of CLE_[STIX]x1D705 as follows: start with an instance of CLE_[STIX]x1D705 , then use a biased coin to independently color each CLE_[STIX]x1D705 loop in one of two colors, and then consider the outer boundaries of the clusters of loops of a given color. Second, we show how to interpret CLE_[STIX]x1D705 loops as interfaces of a continuum analog of critical Bernoulli percolation within CLE_[STIX]x1D705 carpets — this is the first construction of continuum percolation on a fractal planar domain. It extends and generalizes the continuum percolation on open domains defined by SLE₆ and CLE₆ . These constructions allow us to prove several conjectures made by the second author and provide new and perhaps surprising interpretations of the relationship between CLEs and the Gaussian free field. Along the way, we obtain new results about generalized SLE_[STIX]x1D705([STIX]x1D70C) curves for [STIX]x1D70C<-2 , such as their decomposition into collections of SLE_[STIX]x1D705 -type ‘loops’ hanging off of SLE_[STIX]x1D705 -type ‘trunks’, and vice versa (exchanging [STIX]x1D705 and [STIX]x1D705 ). We also define a continuous family of natural CLE variants called boundary conformal loop ensembles (BCLEs) that share some (but not all) of the conformal symmetries that characterize CLE s, and that should be scaling limits of critical models with special boundary conditions. We extend the CLE_[STIX]x1D705 / CLE_[STIX]x1D705 correspondence to a $BCLE_{[S
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: