Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 7, 2015Clinical OtolaryngologyOpen Access

Eustachian tube dysfunction: consensus statement on definition, types, clinical presentation and diagnosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ASAnne GM SchilderMBMahmood F. BhuttaCBChristopher Butler

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Consensus statement defines diagnostic criteria and subtypes for Eustachian tube dysfunction in adults, highlighting standardized endpoints for future clinical trials.

Key Points

  • To establish an international consensus on the definition, clinical subtypes, diagnostic criteria, and trial outcome measures for Eustachian tube dysfunction in adults.
  • Convened an international multidisciplinary panel of clinical and translational specialists in Amsterdam on 21 June 2014.
  • Used a UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment systematic review as the baseline evidence source, refining concepts via an iterative consensus process.
  • Defined Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) as a syndrome of middle ear pressure dysregulation, classified as acute (<3 months) or chronic (≥3 months), with dilatory, baro-challenge-induced, and patulous subtypes.
  • Established that diagnosis requires patient-reported symptoms (aural fullness, popping, discomfort) accompanied by objective evidence of abnormal middle ear pressure via otoscopy or tympanometry.
  • Recommended standardized outcome measurement intervals (baseline, 6–12 weeks, and 6–12 months) incorporating patient-reported symptom scores, otoscopy, tympanometry, and pure tone audiometry for clinical trials.

Cite This Study

Schilder et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8628de9c100a435ae2acehttps://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12475
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share