Experimental comparison of control strategies improves trajectory tracking in coupled UAV systems, suggesting optimal selection methods.
This paper presents a real-time experimental comparison of four control strategies—PID, Fractional-Order PID (FOPID), Fuzzy PID/PD, and Model-Free Control (MFC)—applied to trajectory tracking of a coupled 2-DOF Quanser Aero 2 helicopter. A linear MIMO model is identified to support controller design, and all approaches are evaluated under three operating conditions: coupled dynamics, static decoupling, and dynamic decoupling. Experimental performance is assessed using Integral Square Error, control effort, overshoot, and settling time metrics implemented on the QUARC real-time platform. The results show that interaction mitigation affects control performance. Static decoupling improves tracking accuracy, while dynamic decoupling reduces cross-coupling effects at the expense of increased noise sensitivity. Among the evaluated controllers, the Fuzzy PID/PD strategy achieves the best overall balance between tracking performance and control effort, whereas Model-Free Control provides smoother actuator behavior. The study offers practical experimental guidelines for selecting control strategies in coupled UAV systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: