This review examines L-arginine's effects on vascular function in cardiovascular diseases, indicating its therapeutic potential.
Relevance. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. In recent years, significant attention has been given to L-arginine, a conditionally essential amino acid that serves as a key precursor of nitric oxide, a critically important mediator of vascular function. Dysregulation of L-arginine metabolism and the development of endothelial dysfunction play a significant pathogenetic role in the development and progression of CVDs. Objective. This review aims to systematize current data on the role of L-arginine in the regulation of vascular tone, its impact on endothelium-dependent vasodilation, and to assess the potential application of L-arginine in the intensive care of cardiovascular diseases. Material and methods. A comprehensive analysis of the results of in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, as well as clinical trials focused on examining the influence of L-arginine on endothelial function, hemodynamic parameters, coronary blood flow, and other cardiovascular system parameters was conducted. Particular attention was given to analyzing the molecular mechanisms of NO-mediated action of L-arginine and its interaction with the arginase enzyme. Results. L-arginine contributes to enhancing endothelium-dependent vasodilation, reducing blood pressure, and can have a positive impact in cases of coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atherosclerosis. It is important to note that the effectiveness of L-arginine therapy can be modulated by the level of ADMA, an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Conclusion. L-arginine represents a promising therapeutic agent for use in the intensive care of CVDs, especially in patients facing potential ischemia-reperfusion syndrome. To determine optimal therapeutic strategies, including dosage selection and identification of target patient groups, further large-scale, placebo-controlled clinical studies are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simutis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: