Why the study?
What is the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with STEMI and multi-vessel coronary artery disease?
What is the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with STEMI and multi-vessel coronary artery disease?
This review suggests that for STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease, single-vessel acute PCI of the infarct-related artery should be the default strategy until large randomized trials prove otherwise.
Single-vessel acute PCI may remain default in STEMI with multivessel disease; leaves open acute multivessel PCI until large RCTs confirm benefit.
Over 50% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients suffer multi-vessel coronary artery disease, which is known to be associated with worse prognosis. Treatment strategies used in clinical practice vary from acute multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), through staged PCI procedures to a conservative approach with primary PCI of only the infarct-related artery (IRA) and subsequent medical therapy unless recurrent ischaemia occurs. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. This review paper summarizes the international experience and authors' opinion on this clinically important question. Multi-vessel disease in STEMI is not a single entity and thus the treatment approach should be individualized. However, the following general rules can be proposed till future large randomized trials prove otherwise: (i) Single-vessel acute PCI should be the default strategy (to treat only the IRA during the acute phase of STEMI). (ii) Acute multi-vessel PCI can be justified only in exceptional patients with multiple critical (>90%) and potentially unstable lesions. (iii) Significant lesions of the non-infarct arteries should be treated either medically or by staged revascularization procedures-both options are currently acceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widimsky et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: