Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon capture and utilization for concrete production (CCU concrete) is estimated to sequester 0.1 to 1.4 gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO₂) by 2050. However, existing estimates do not account for the CO₂ impact from the capture, transport and utilization of CO₂, change in compressive strength in CCU concrete and uncertainty and variability in CCU concrete production processes. By accounting for these factors, we determine the net CO₂ benefit when CCU concrete produced from CO₂ curing and mixing substitutes for conventional concrete. The results demonstrate a higher likelihood of the net CO₂ benefit of CCU concrete being negative i.e. there is a net increase in CO₂ in 56 to 68 of 99 published experimental datasets depending on the CO₂ source. Ensuring an increase in compressive strength from CO₂ curing and mixing and decreasing the electricity used in CO₂ curing are promising strategies to increase the net CO₂ benefit from CCU concrete.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravikumar et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: