Why the study?
To examine empirical, methodological, and theoretical connections between the late positive potential and P300 as common neural responses to stimulus significance.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Integrative review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unifies LPP/P300 interpretations around stimulus significance; leaves open empirical tests across clinical populations.
Event-related potential studies of emotional processing have focused on the late positive potential (LPP), a sustained positive deflection in the ERP that is increased for emotionally arousing stimuli. A prominent theory suggests that modulation of the LPP is a response to stimulus significance, defined in terms of the activation of appetitive and aversive motivational systems. The current review incorporates experimental studies showing that manipulations that alter the significance of stimuli alter LPP amplitude. Complementing these within-person studies, also included is individual differences research on depression wherein the LPP has been used to study reduced neural sensitivity to emotional stimuli. Finally, the current review builds an existing framework that the LPP observed in studies in emotional processing and the P300 observed in classic oddball studies may reflect a common response to stimulus significance. This integrative account has implications for the functional interpretation of these ERPs, their neurobiological mechanisms, and clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajcak et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: