Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There are clinically significant method-dependent differences in TSB results from neonatal samples, consistent with our clinical incident. The differences are largely due to lack of standardisation of calibrator values. This has implications for healthcare resource use and possibly for the neurodevelopment of infants. Intervention is needed at a number of levels, including clinical reporting of incidents arising from discordant results, commitment by manufacturers to ensure metrological traceability of methods with sufficiently low uncertainty in the final measurements, and availability of commutable quality assurance material to monitor assay performance, especially at the clinical decision points for neonatal jaundice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: