Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 2, 2015The American Journal of GastroenterologyOpen Access

Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DCDustin A. CarlsonNorthwestern UniversityKRKarthik RaviMayo Clinic in ArizonaPeter J. KahrilasPeter J. KahrilasUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Carlson et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d963f9da3af5b1d0836700https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.159
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry2014 · 51 citations
  2. 2Interobserver Variability in Esophageal Body Measurements With High-resolution Manometry Among New Physician Users2012 · 10 citations
  3. 3Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry2011 · 165 citations
  4. 4Interrater and Intrarater Agreement of the Chicago Classification of Achalasia Subtypes Using High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry2011 · 29 citations
  5. 5Pneumatic Dilation versus Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Idiopathic Achalasia2011 · 857 citations