Why the study?
Heart failure guideline implementation is poor and target drug doses are rarely achieved due to tolerability issues, creating a need to tailor and prioritize medical therapy according to patient profiles.
Does a personalized approach adjusting guideline-directed medical therapy to patient profiles improve therapy implementation in patients with HFrEF compared to traditional forced titration?
Does a personalized approach adjusting guideline-directed medical therapy to patient profiles improve therapy implementation in patients with HFrEF compared to traditional forced titration?
Tailoring guideline-directed medical therapy to specific patient profiles in HFrEF may overcome tolerability issues and improve treatment implementation compared to traditional forced titration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Personalized profiling may enhance GDMT implementation in HFrEF; extends guidelines with actionable patient-specific strategies.
Despite guideline recommendations and available evidence, implementation of treatment in heart failure (HF) is poor. The majority of patients are not prescribed drugs at target doses that have been proven to positively impact morbidity and mortality. Among others, tolerability issues related to low blood pressure, heart rate, impaired renal function or hyperkalaemia are responsible. Chronic kidney disease plays an important role as it affects up to 50% of patients with HF. Also, dynamic changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate may occur during the course of HF, resulting in inappropriate dose reduction or even discontinuation of decongestive or neurohormonal modulating therapy in clinical practice. As patients with HF are rarely naïve to pharmacologic therapies, the challenge is to adequately prioritize or select the most appropriate up-titration schedule according to patient profile. In this consensus document, we identified nine patient profiles that may be relevant for treatment implementation in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction. These profiles take into account heart rate (<60 bpm or >70 bpm), the presence of atrial fibrillation, symptomatic low blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (<30 or >30 mL/min/1.73 m² ) or hyperkalaemia. The pre-discharge patient, frequently still congestive, is also addressed. A personalized approach, adjusting guideline-directed medical therapy to patient profile, may allow to achieve a better and more comprehensive therapy for each individual patient than the more traditional, forced titration of each drug class before initiating treatment with the next.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosano et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: