Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although linguistic signs in isolation are symbolic, the system or grammar which relates them may be diagrammatically iconic in two ways: (a) by isomorphism, a bi-unique correspondence tends to be established between signans and signatum; (b) by motivation, the structure of language directly reflects some aspect of the structure of reality. Isomorphism is so nearly universal that deviations from it require explanation. Motivation, although widespread, establishes a typology of languages, as indicated in Saussure's Cours. The evidence of artificial taboo languages suggests that degree of motivation co-varies inversely with the number of ‘prima onomata’ in the lexicon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Haiman (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: