Why the study?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is recommended to improve hypertension management, prompting investigation into the accuracy of the wearable cuff-less InBodyWATCH device compared with a manual sphygmomanometer.
Does a wearable cuff-less device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to a manual sphygmomanometer in adults?
Does a wearable cuff-less device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to a manual sphygmomanometer in adults?
A wearable cuff-less wristwatch-type device provides accurate blood pressure estimations comparable to manual sphygmomanometry, highlighting its potential for ambulatory monitoring.
May support cuffless wearable BP estimation in adults; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is recommended to improve the management of hypertension. Here, we investigated the accuracy of BP estimated using a wearable cuff-less device, InBodyWATCH, compared with BP measured using a manual sphygmomanometer. Thirty-five adults were enrolled (age 57.1 ± 17.9 years). The BP was estimated using InBodyWATCH with an individualized estimation based on a neural network model. Three paired sets of BPs from the two devices were compared using correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots (n = 105 paired BP readings). The correlations for both systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) between the two devices were high (r = 0.964 and 0.939, both P < 0.001). The mean difference was 2.2 ± 6.1 mmHg for SBP and -0.2 ± 4.2 mmHg for DBP; these were not significant (P = 0.472 for SBP and P = 0.880 for DBP). The proportions of estimated SBP/DBP obtained from the InBodyWATCH within ± 5 mmHg of manual SBP/DBP were 71.4%/83.8%; within ± 10 mmHg they were 86.7%/98.1%; and within ± 15 mmHg they were 97.1%/99.0%. The estimated BP from this wearable cuff-less device correlated highly with the manual BP and showed good accuracy, suggesting its potential to be used in ambulatory BP monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moon et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: