Key result
Home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are stronger predictors of hypertension-related outcomes than office blood pressure monitoring, supporting their preferential use in clinical practice.
Home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provide superior prognostic information compared to office measurements and are recommended for confirming hypertension diagnoses.
Home BP monitoring offers practical advantages; leaves open optimal ABPM integration in hypertension management.
Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring is becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Home BP and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) are the two forms of monitoring BP in the out-of-office environment. Home BP monitoring is easy to perform, inexpensive, and engages patients in the care of their hypertension. Although ABPM is expensive and not widely available, it remains the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension. Observational studies show that both home BP and ABPM are stronger predictors of hypertension-related outcomes than office BP monitoring. There are no clinical trials showing their superiority over office BP monitoring in guiding the treatment of hypertension, but the consistency of observational data make a compelling case for their preferential use in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldo J. Peixoto (2015) conducted a review in Hypertension. Home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Office blood pressure monitoring was evaluated. Home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are stronger predictors of hypertension-related outcomes than office blood pressure monitoring, supporting their preferential use in clinical practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: