This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Lane changes require dynamic decision-making and rapid behavior planning, which are challenging for traffic modeling. We propose a two-dimensional following lane-changing framework (2DF-LC) that exploits the benefits of car-following (CF) models for computational efficiency, collision avoidance, and human-like behavior. This framework uses a sigmoid-based intelligent driver model (SIDM) with both longitudinal and lateral following. To avoid excessive acceleration at start-up, we develop an SIDM that ensures a smooth start-up. In the longitudinal plane, we introduce a transition function to create a double-target car-following model (DT-SIDM) that can handle sudden acceleration changes due to target switching, thereby guaranteeing stable longitudinal motion and dynamic collision avoidance. In the lateral plane, we develop a lateral movement car-following model (LM-SIDM) inspired by a social force model. The LM-SIDM defines both lane and gap forces, resulting in effective lateral motion and collision avoidance during lane changes. Simulations and tests in three typical scenarios show that 2DF-LC has high computational efficiency: it completes calculations within milliseconds. Compared with the widely used hierarchical motion planning system (HMPS) and integrated model and learning combined algorithm (IMLC) methods, 2DF-LC based on real trajectories reduces the errors by 49.5% and 16.1%, respectively, and achieves a 28.63% lower time-integrated anticipated collision time (TI-ACT) than the original trajectories, indicating improved safety. Moreover, 2DF-LC produces a smooth acceleration curve, with an average jerk value of 0.358 m/s 3 . The lane-change trajectory generated by 2DF-LC can also be followed and executed effectively in CarSim tests.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: