Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates sideway lane changing in complex traffic scenarios around large-sized vehicles from a microscopic perspective by incorporating vehicle dimensions into the driving risk potential field (DRPF) model. Large-sized vehicles generate a stronger DRPF, which extends into adjacent lanes, enabling effective two-dimensional analysis of traffic behaviors. Through the analysis of the DRPF and the associated driving risk force field (DRFF), sideway lane changing are categorized into three categories: rear-side lane changing, lateral-side lane changing, and front-side lane changing. Statistical results reveal that lateral-side and rear-side lane-changing events account for the majority of sideway lane-changing occurrences, with spatial distribution density indicating that the rear half of the vehicle body is a high-frequency zone for such maneuvers. Furthermore, event-level parameter calibration and trajectory fitting were conducted for three representative sideway lane-changing events, representing rear-side, lateral-side, and front-side interaction scenarios, respectively. For these three cases, the simulated trajectories captured the main features of the observed two-dimensional vehicle motions, with relatively small positional errors. The DRPF model extends traditional one-dimensional traffic behavior analysis to a more realistic two-dimensional framework, validating its its capability and goodness of fit in studying complex traffic behaviors such as sideway lane changing. This advancement highlights its potential for broader applications in cutting-edge traffic research, providing a basis for future investigations of trajectory prediction and autonomous driving applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ling et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: