Dangerous lane changes in urban expressway merging areas involve multi-vehicle interactions and coupled lateral–longitudinal risk, which instantaneous longitudinal surrogate safety measures alone cannot capture. This study proposes a framework jointly capturing longitudinal car-following risk and lateral intrusion risk. Vehicle trajectories were extracted from UAV videos at an urban expressway merging area, yielding 206 lane-change samples after screening and reconstruction. Longitudinal safety distance indices were built using a stopping sight distance model, and lateral indices via a responsibility-sensitive safety model. Risk exposure and severity were calculated per dimension and integrated through a fault-tree structure into a composite risk index. The classification threshold was determined using a probability-weighted moments method, with robustness evaluated through bootstrap resampling. The framework identified 53 dangerous lane changes (25.7% of samples). Cross-scenario validation using near-crash events from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study achieved 100% recall, versus 69.2% for a conventional TTC-based method. Risk decomposition showed that TTC-missed events were predominantly lateral-driven, demonstrating superior capability in detecting longitudinally safe but laterally dangerous scenarios. These findings provide a quantitative foundation for identifying dangerous lane changes and supporting proactive safety management in expressway merging areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: