Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This tutorial clarifies the axiomatic definition of <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">( #FF0000v^#000000(#FF0000α#000000)#000000,#FF0000i^ #000000(#FF0000β#000000)#000000)</tex></formula> circuit elements via a lookup table dubbed an A-pad, of admissible <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">(#FF0000v#000000,#FF0000i#000000)</tex></formula> signals measured via Gedanken probing circuits. The <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">(#FF0000v^ #000000(#FF00FFα#000000)#000000,#FF0000i^#000000( #FF00FFβ#000000)#000000)</tex></formula> elements are ordered via a complexity metric. Under this metric, the memristor emerges naturally as the fourth element, characterized by a state-dependent Ohm's law. A logical generalization to memristive devices reveals a common fingerprint consisting of a dense continuum of pinched hysteresis loops whose area decreases with the frequency <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">ω</tex></formula> and tends to a straight line as <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">ω →∞</tex></formula> , for all bipolar periodic signals and for all initial conditions. This common fingerprint suggests that the term memristor be used henceforth as a moniker for memristive devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon O. Chua (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: