Pilot trial demonstrates enhanced balance and gait function in post-stroke patients with training.
Background: Stroke-related impairments in balance and gait are among the most common and disabling sequelae, significantly limiting functional independence and increasing fall risk. This study investigated the effects of short-term dynamic balance training on balance and gait in post-stroke hemiplegic patients. Methods: In this randomized controlled pilot trial, 16 post-stroke hemiplegic patients (intervention group, n = 8; control group, n = 8; mean age ≈ 58 years; predominantly male) were assigned to either a control group receiving conventional rehabilitation or an intervention group receiving additional daily dynamic balance training using the Prokin-252 system (30 min/day, 5 days/week, 3 weeks). Primary outcome measures included balance performance (Berg Balance Scale, mini-BESTest, single-leg stance), center-of-pressure (COP) parameters, gait performance (Timed Up and Go Test), and surface electromyography (sEMG) activity. Results: Following the intervention, both groups demonstrated improvements; however, the intervention group showed significantly greater gains in balance and gait outcomes. Specifically, Berg Balance Scale scores improved significantly (p = 0.012), as did mini-BESTest scores (p = 0.004). Eyes-closed single-leg stance time increased significantly on both sides (p < 0.05). COP analysis revealed reductions in sway area and trajectory length under challenging conditions. sEMG analysis indicated increased activation of the affected-side gluteus medius. In terms of gait performance, the intervention group demonstrated greater improvements in Timed Up and Go Test performance (p = 0.002), dual-task walking, and gait phase symmetry. Conclusions: Supplementing conventional rehabilitation with dynamic balance training effectively enhances balance and gait function in post-stroke patients, potentially through improved neuromuscular control. The integration of sensor-based COP analysis and sEMG provides additional mechanistic insight into rehabilitation outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: