Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis reveals coping strategies and challenges for healthcare professionals amidst pandemic pressures, highlighting implications for their wellbeing.
This article examines how healthcare professionals working on COVID-19 wards experienced psychosocial burdens during the pandemic and how they managed these within the intersecting pressures of personal vulnerability, professional duty, and institutional expectation. Drawing on deep-structure hermeneutics, 13 qualitative interviews were analysed to explore latent meaning structures underlying professional discourse. From this corpus, one analytically rich interview was selected for an in-depth single-case analysis. It illustrates how a rhetoric of positivity and a strictly maintained professional role served as protective defences against anxiety, helplessness, and loss of control. Within this dynamic, functionality emerged as a latent mode of coping that re-established a sense of agency and order, yet simultaneously suppressed emotional expression and acknowledgement of personal needs. These findings reveal a psychosocial paradox at the heart of clinical work under crisis conditions: maintaining reliability and composure while risking emotional detachment and exhaustion. As a theoretically informed implication of these findings, we propose the potential value of "spaces of non-functioning"-temporary contexts that allow relief from performance demands without destabilising professional identity. Such protected spaces may provide a more sustainable balance between care for others and self-care within the culture of contemporary healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: