Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study reveals effective ELISA methods to differentiate antibodies in infected and vaccinated chickens, highlighting their importance in disease management.
Fowl adenovirus serotype 4 (FAdV-4) has been identified as the primary pathogen responsible for hydropericardium-hepatitis syndrome (HHS), resulting in significant economic losses in major poultry-producing countries since 2015. Timely and accurate diagnosis of FAdV-4 infection is essential for the effective prevention and control of HHS. In this study, the two nonstructural genes of FAdV-4, 100K and 22K, were inserted into the expression vector pET-32a (+) respectively. The expressed recombinant proteins were used as coating antigens to develop two indirect ELISA methods, designated as 100K-ELISA and 22K-ELISA. Both ELISAs demonstrated high specificity, showing no cross-reactivity with serum samples positive for other avian diseases. Both ELISAs yielded positive results when applied to 50 serum samples from SPF chickens experimentally infected with FAdV-4 and negative results when applied to 50 serum samples from SPF chickens immunized with an inactivated FAdV-4 vaccine. Similarly, the field sample testing results demonstrated a significant ability to distinguish between vaccinated and infected samples. The 100K-ELISA and 22K-ELISA, which are based on nonstructural proteins, may be effective tools for differentiating between FAdV-4 infection and vaccination, offering a promising approach for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) strategies in poultry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: