Why the study?
Does the 100K-33K-ELISA distinguish acute FAdV infection from vaccination response in chickens?
Does the 100K-33K-ELISA distinguish acute FAdV infection from vaccination response in chickens?
The 100K-33K-ELISA is a sensitive and specific method to differentiate acute fowl adenovirus infection from vaccination responses in chickens.
May support differentiation of acute FAdV infection from vaccination in chickens; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Antibodies specific to the non-structural proteins of viruses are detected in virus-infected animals and show promise as a reliable diagnostic marker for virus infections. We examined the potential use of two non-structural proteins of fowl adenovirus (FAdV)-based, 100K and 33K, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in the diagnosis of FAdVs. We cloned and expressed the 100K and 33K non-structural protein genes of the FAdVs in the pGEX-4T-1 plasmid vector. Purified 100K and 33K proteins alone or in combination were used as antigens in ELISAs. Antibodies specific to the 100K and 33K non-structural proteins were detected in chickens experimentally infected with FAdVs, but not in chickens vaccinated with inactivated FAdVs. In contrast, the agar gel precipitation (AGP) test detected FAdV-specific antibodies in 70.3% of the vaccinated chickens, suggesting that the non-structural protein-based ELISA could be used in the differential diagnosis of infected and vaccinated chickens. To further validate the 100K and 33K-based ELISA (100K-33K-ELISA) method, we compared its sensitivity and specificity with that of a whole virus-based ELISA and an AGP test in detecting FAdV-specific antibodies in 350 field samples. The results showed that the 100K-33K-ELISA exhibited a higher sensitivity than the AGP test and a comparable sensitivity and specificity to the whole virus ELISA. Overall, the 100K-33K-ELISA method is sensitive, specific and can be used to distinguish an acute FAdV infection from an inactivated virus-based vaccination response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: