Proposes a design method for combined shear connectors to improve structural performance in steel–UHPC beams, suggesting efficient force transfer.
Steel–UHPC composite beams are widely used in bridge engineering due to their high strength, durability, and suitability for prefabricated construction. However, the mechanical performance of shear connectors in UHPC differs significantly, and the uniform use of a single connector type along the beam span may result in a mismatch between connector mechanical characteristics and regional force demands, leading to suboptimal force transfer and inefficient utilization of connector capacity along the beam span. While previous studies have mainly focused on the local behavior of individual connectors, a system-level design strategy considering regional force demands is still limited. This study proposes a system-level design method for combined shear connectors in steel–UHPC composite beams, in which headed stud connectors and trapezoidal composite dowel connectors are arranged according to bending moment distribution and interface shear demand, thereby integrating connector mechanical characteristics with the spatial variation in internal forces along the beam span. The design procedure includes shear span division, longitudinal interface shear calculation, and resistance verification of different connector types. The method is applied to a practical steel–UHPC composite beam in a long-span approach bridge. Results show that headed studs provide reliable uplift resistance and ductile behavior in negative bending regions, whereas composite dowel connectors are shown to be more suitable for shear-dominated positive bending regions due to their higher shear capacity and stiffness. The combined system ensures effective composite action under different stress states and reduces total connector steel consumption compared with a stud-only layout. The proposed approach advances connector design toward performance-oriented and system-level structural optimization, providing a practical framework for connector arrangement in steel–UHPC composite beams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: