Why the study?
Does multitasking T1 mapping provide good image quality, repeatability, and correlation with standard MOLLI T1 and ECV in healthy subjects and acute myocardial infarction patients?
Does multitasking T1 mapping provide good image quality, repeatability, and correlation with standard MOLLI T1 and ECV in healthy subjects and acute myocardial infarction patients?
Multitasking T1 mapping offers a feasible free-breathing, non-ECG alternative for quantifying myocardial T1 and ECV with good repeatability and correlation to standard MOLLI.
Supports feasibility of free-breathing T1 mapping in AMI; leaves open larger validation before clinical adoption.
Multitasking T₁ mapping can quantify native T₁ and ECV in the myocardium with free-breathing, non-ECG, continuous scans with good image quality and good repeatability in vivo in healthy subjects, and correlation with MOLLI T₁ and ECV in acute myocardial infarction patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaw et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: