Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Four experimental methods of determining the enthalpy of the flow in an arc-jet facility that is, the heat balance method, the sonic throat method, the heat transfer method, and the emission-spectroscopic method, are compared with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution. The comparison is made for the Interaction Heating Facility of NASA Ames Research Center for one operating condition. The mass-averaged enthalpy values determined by the heat-balance method and the sonic throat method are 28.7 and 28.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The lower bound of the centerline enthalpy value determined by the heat transfer rate method is 30.5 MJ/kg. The spectrometric method resulted in the centerline enthalpy value of 40.6 MJ/kg. The CFD solution yields the centerline and the average enthalpy values at the nozzle throat of 41.0 and 27.0 MJ/kg, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: