As a possible solution to the problem of scrap-tire disposal, an experimental study was conducted to examine the potential use of tire chips and crumb rubber as aggregate substitutes in portland-cement concrete mixes. In this study, strength, durability, and toughness as well as workability, unit weight, and volume change were examined. Rubberized concrete was found to possess acceptable workability and a smaller unit weight than plain concrete. Volume change of rubberized concrete specimens containing 38, 25, and 19-mm rubber aggregates was found to be larger than that of plain concrete. Rubberized concrete specimens exhibited lower compressive and splitting-tensile strength than did plain concrete specimens. However, rubberized concrete did not demonstrate a brittle failure, but rather a ductile, plastic failure, and had the ability to absorb a large amount of plastic energy under compressive and tensile loads. A mathematical model is used to describe quantitatively the effects of rubber aggregates on the compressive and splitting-tensile strength reduction of concrete.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eldin et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: