This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) affects about 80 000 patients in the US annually and directly causes about 11 000 deaths. Therefore, despite the fact that there are several drugs available for the treatment of MRSA, there is a need for new chemical entities. We previously reported that 1,3,4-oxadiazolyl sulfonamide F6 was bacteriostatic and inhibited MRSA strains with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 μg mL⁻¹. Here, we report the discovery of trifluoromethoxy (OCF₃), trifluoromethylsulfonyl (SO₂CF₃), trifluoromethylthio (SCF₃) and pentafluorosulfanyl (SF₅) containing (1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzamides exhibiting potent antibacterial activities against MRSA [MIC values as low as 0.06 μg mL⁻¹ against linezolid-resistant S. aureus (NRS 119)]. Interestingly, whereas the OCF₃ and SO₂CF₃ containing oxadiazoles were bacteriostatic, the SCF₃ and SF₅ containing oxadiazoles were bactericidal. They exhibited a wide spectrum of activities against an extensive panel of Gram-positive bacterial strains, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) and methicillin-resistant or cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Furthermore, compounds 6 and 12 outperformed vancomycin in clearing intracellular MRSA in infected macrophages. Moreover, the tested compounds behaved synergistically or additively with antibiotics used for the treatment of MRSA infections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naclerio et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: