PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2004California Management Review530 citations

Leveraging the Corporate Brand

View Full Paper
DADavid A. Aaker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Brand assets are difficult and expensive to develop, maintain, and adapt. The offering environment is cluttered, confused, and complex in part because of the proliferation of products, brands, and sub-brands. Dynamic market contexts with the emergence of new sub-categories make it necessary to adapt and stretch brands, putting additional strain on their ability to deliver the needed support. In this context, the corporate brand (or, more generally, an organization brand) can be dialed up to play a more prominent role in the brand portfolio. The corporate brand defines the firm that will deliver and stand behind the offering that the customer will buy and use. The brand has access to organizational as well as product associations and the flexibility to play several roles within the brand portfolio. Of most significance is its potential in some contexts to be a master brand with a significant driver role. In fact, in the case of Dell, UPS, Sony, Samsung, IBM, and others, it can been seen as the ultimate branded house, where the product brands consist largely of the corporate brand plus a descriptor. In these cases, the use of a corporate brand as a master brand maximizes brand portfolio goals such as generating leverage, synergy, and clarity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David A. Aaker (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69daac083bc1ef7225684919https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560404600301
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper