Cross-sectional study evaluates neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of complications and mortality in acute coronary syndrome, suggesting its utility in clinical practice.
Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Inflammation plays a key role in its pathogenesis, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a potential prognostic marker. This study aimed to evaluate its role in predicting in-hospital complications and mortality among patients admitted with ACS. Methods This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study included 103 patients admitted with ACS. Patients were categorized into two groups based on NLR: <7 (n = 57, 55.3%) and ≥7 (n = 46, 44.7%). Clinical parameters, laboratory findings, and outcomes, including complications, heart failure, arrhythmias, and mortality, were recorded and analyzed. Results Among the study participants, 76 (73.7%) were male and 27 (26.3%) were female, with the majority aged 40-60 years. Hypertension was present in 42 (40.7%) patients, and diabetes mellitus was present in 57 (55.4%) patients. Elevated NLR (≥7) was significantly associated with left ventricular dysfunction (38/63, 60.3%), compared to 8/40 (20.0%) in the low-NLR group (p < 0.001). Heart failure was more frequent in the high-NLR group (34/54, 63.0%) than in the low-NLR group (20/54, 37.0%) (p < 0.001). Arrhythmias were observed in 24/36 (66.7%) patients with high NLR, compared to 12/36 (33.3%) patients with low NLR (p = 0.001). Complications were significantly more common in patients with elevated NLR (43/46, 93.5%) than in those with lower NLR (40/57, 70.2%) (p = 0.003). Mortality was also significantly higher in the high-NLR group (21/27, 77.8%) than in the low-NLR group (6/27, 22.2%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Elevated NLR is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in ACS. It can serve as a simple and effective tool for early risk stratification and prognostication in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priyanka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: