Background/Objectives: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recently redefined as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), represents a growing global health burden closely linked to obesity, insulin resistance, and dietary patterns. Despite intense drug-development efforts, effective and widely approved pharmacological therapies remain limited. Methods: In this work, we systematically evaluated the quality of clinical evidence supporting currently proposed pharmacological treatments for MASLD/MASLD using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, focusing on phase III and IV clinical trials. Results: Our analysis demonstrates that overall quality of evidence for most pharmacological agents ranges from very low to moderate, primarily due to imprecision and suspected publication bias. Conclusions: Overall, our findings reinforce that, in the current therapeutic landscape, pharmacological therapies should be reserved for carefully selected patients and interpreted in the context of limited evidence certainty.
Karavia et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: