Retrospective study compares medical versus surgical management outcomes in patients with appendiceal inflammatory mass, highlighting malignancy risks and necessary surveillance.
BackgroundThe management of an appendiceal inflammatory mass (historically termed "plastron") is controversial due to debates over optimal treatment strategies and malignancy risk. This 15-year retrospective study compares medical vs surgical outcomes, provides granular malignancy data, and aims to establish a risk-stratified surveillance protocol.Material and MethodsThis STROBE-compliant retrospective study analyzed 79 consecutive patients (2009-2024) with radiologically confirmed appendiceal inflammatory masses at University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital. We performed propensity score-adjusted comparisons between medical (antibiotics ± percutaneous drainage, n = 32) and surgical (n = 47) groups. Outcomes focused on success rates, complications, hospital stay, malignancy (histopathology), and colonoscopic findings.ResultsMedical management was initially successful (68.7%, 22/32), resulting in significantly shorter hospitalization (mean difference 2.8 days, 95% CI: 0.2-5.4, 4.1 ± 2.7 vs 6.9 ± 4.8 days, P = 0.03) and fewer complications (OR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9, 9.3% vs 23.4%, P = 0.04) vs surgery. Interval appendectomy was required in 31.2% (10/32) of medical patients. Malignancies were identified in 15.1% overall (95% CI: 7.9%-24.9%), including 6.2% diagnosed only at interval appendectomy. Colonoscopy was performed in 31.6% (25/79) and detected significant neoplasia in 20.0% (5/25; 95% CI: 8.9%-39.1%), predominantly among clinically high-risk patients.ConclusionConservative management is effective, but the substantial malignancy risk (15.1%) and high colonoscopy yield (19%) in this high-risk tertiary cohort necessitate vigilant surveillance. Consistent with updated screening guidance, we recommend colonoscopic evaluation for patients aged ≥45 and/or those with elevated tumor markers or suspicious imaging, and a lower threshold for interval appendectomy in high-risk phenotypes, supporting a risk-stratified approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kudaş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: