Comparative analysis assesses accuracy of MRI and intraoperative methods for ACL footprint localization, indicating MRI superiority.
Background: Accurate localization of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint is essential for successful reconstruction. Conventional intraoperative techniques may lack precision. Aims and Objectives: To compare the accuracy of intraoperative methods with preoperative MRI-based techniques for ACL footprint localization. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature review (2023–2025) was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies comparing MRI-based and intraoperative techniques were analyzed for accuracy and clinical outcomes. Results: 3D MRI demonstrated high accuracy with deviations of ~1–2 mm. Both 2D and 3D MRI showed excellent reliability (<1.2 mm difference). In contrast, intraoperative methods showed greater variability (~4–5 mm). Navigation and patient-specific guides improved accuracy but still demonstrated minor deviations (~5 mm). Conclusion: MRI-based planning, especially 3D MRI combined with navigation or patient-specific guides, provides superior accuracy in ACL footprint localization and may reduce graft failure rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
More et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: