Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 1994European Respiratory JournalOpen Access

Comparison of cervical magnetic stimulation and bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves in normal subjects

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SWS WraggRoyal Brompton HospitalRAR. AquilinaUniversity College LondonJMJohn M. MoranRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Wragg et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbdcf47d378569a98366fahttps://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.94.07101788
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relaxation Rate of Constituent Muscle-Fibre Types in Human Quadriceps1979 · 61 citations
  2. 2Function of the isolated paced diaphragm and the cervical accessory muscles in C1 quadriplegics.1979 · 89 citations
  3. 3A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique.1982 · 1,092 citations
  4. 4Diaphragmatic relaxation rate after voluntary contractions and uni- and bilateral phrenic stimulation1988 · 22 citations
  5. 5Factors limiting depth of a maximal inspiration in human subjects1963 · 45 citations