PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2014Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture51 citations

Tool wear and hole quality when single-shot drilling of metallic-composite stacks with diamond-coated tools

View Full Paper
CKChun Liang KuoSSSein Leung SooDAD.K. Aspinwall

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article details experimental work performed to evaluate the effects of varying feed rate (0.08 and 0.15 mm/rev) and tool coatings (diamond-like carbon and chemical vapour–deposited diamond) on tool wear modes and hole quality when drilling 30-mm-thick Ti-6Al-4V/carbon fibre–reinforced plastic/Al-7050 stacks in a single-shot operation. At a feed rate of 0.08 mm/rev, the diametrical accuracy of holes produced by both the chemical vapour–deposited diamond and diamond-like carbon–coated drills (6.38 mm diameter) was comparable within a tolerance of ±0.04 mm even after 70 holes. However, in terms of cylindricity, holes machined with chemical vapour–deposited diamond were significantly better than those produced using the diamond-like carbon–coated drills by a factor of ∼2 (65.7 vs 140.6 µm). A similar trend was also observed for hole out of roundness. Burr height at hole entry locations (Ti layer) ranged from ∼0.03 to 0.08 mm for all trials undertaken at the lower feed rate level; however, the diamond-like carbon–coated drills generated exit burrs which were ∼4 times larger than their chemical vapour–deposited diamond-coated counterparts. Subsequent wear analysis showed that diamond-like carbon–coated drills operating at 0.08 mm/rev typically exhibited progressive abrasion, workpiece adhesion and chipping leading to fracture of the tool corner, while fracture due to fatigue was prevalent in tests carried out at the high feed rate level. In contrast, poor adhesion of the chemical vapour–deposited diamond coating to the carbide substrate led to premature flaking, severe chipping and fracture of the drill cutting and chisel edge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuo et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc206d21d1c80c0f751e6chttps://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413517388
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fractography - Observing, Measuring and Interpreting Fracture Surface Topography2000 · 491 citations
  2. 2Optimization and control of drilling burr formation of AISI 304L and AISI 4118 based on drilling burr control charts2001 · 153 citations
  3. 3Finite Element Modeling of Burr Formation Process in Drilling 304 Stainless Steel1999 · 118 citations
  4. 4Carbon fiber reinforced plastics in aircraft construction2005 · 878 citations
  5. 5The new diamond technology and its application in cutting tools1992 · 19 citations