In this section we want to re-prove the results of ?? 4 and 8 using sheaf cohomology. One reason for doing this is to clarify the discussion in those paragraphs and, in particular, to show how Macaulay's theorem 4.11 is essentially equivalent to a suitable vanishing theorem for sheaf cohomology. We shall also give a proof of the de Rham algebraic theorem used in the proof of Theorem 5.3. However, our principal motivation is to be able to discuss rational integrals in case our hypersurface V c P, has rather simple singularities, and the localization technique of sheaf theory seems to be the best method for doing this (cf. ?? 15, 16 below). Let then V c P, be a non-singular hypersurface. We want to give a sheaf-theoretic version of the Hodge filtration of Hq(V, C) (cf. ? 8). For this we let Qv be the sheaf on V of holomorphic q-forms and & c QV the subsheaf of closed forms. The Poincare' lemma for holomorphic differentials gives an exact sequence
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip A. Griffiths (1969) studied this question.