Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work deals with the effects of the contact angle as an essential factor in bubble motions underneath downward-facing surfaces of the anode in the aluminum reduction cell. First, a transient three-dimensional (3D) mathematical model is employed to study a single bubble motion with the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method. In addition, a transient 3D model coupled with the discrete phase model and the VOF method is employed to track the microdispersed (∼micrometer or ∼millimeter) and macroscale (∼centimeter) bubbles in various contact angles. A discrete continuum transition model is developed to link the micro- to macroscale of bubbles and analyze the multiscale bubbles co-existing beneath the anode. The predicted gas coverage gives a reasonable match with the experimental data in the literature. The bubble release frequency decreases with increasing the contact angle provided that the contact angle is smaller than 90°, whereas the opposite occurs when the contact angles are larger than 90°.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: