A study evaluates the impact of transtracheal gas flow on dyspnea perception, suggesting anesthesia abolishes its effects.
The effects of nasal cannula gas flow on dyspnea have been studied by Liss and Grant (Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:1285), who concluded that reduction of dyspnea was a placebo effect from the wearing of the nasal cannula. We conducted a similar study in subjects using transtracheal oxygen catheters (TTOCs). METHODS: Nine patients with chronic lung disease and hypoxemia were administered zero flow, 2 and 4 L/min of air, and 2 and 4 L/min of oxygen via their TTOCs. After each study segment, the subjects recorded their degree of dyspnea on a visual analog scale (VAS) calibrated from 0 (not short of breath) to 100 (extremely short of breath). After the first five tests, the subjects' tracheas were anesthetized with topical 1% lidocaine via their TTOCs, and the five tests were repeated. RESULTS: Prior to tracheal anesthesia, air and oxygen flows at 4 L/min produced significantly higher VAS scores (more dyspnea) than at baseline (air, p = 0.0233; oxygen, p = 0.0183). Air and oxygen at 2 L/min did not produce VAS scores significantly higher than baseline scores (air, p = 0.3196; oxygen, p = 0.0669). VAS scores associated with 4 L/min air and oxygen flows were significantly higher than scores associated with 2 L/min flows (p = 0.0179). VAS scores during zero flow prior to tracheal anesthesia were not significantly different from baseline VAS values (p = 0.5534). After tracheal anesthesia, no significant relationship was found between gas flowrate and VAS scores (p = 0.9618). The anesthesia appeared to eliminate the effect of transtracheal gas flow on dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: Transtracheal gas administration can affect the perception of dyspnea in patients with chronic lung disease. This effect on flow-sensitive tracheal receptors appears to be abolished by tracheal anesthesia .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kollef et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: