Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) will be sensitive to a finite number of gravitational wave (GW) ``point'' sources (e.g. supermassive black hole binaries). N quiet pulsars with accurately known distances dₚᵤₗₛₐᵣ can characterize up to $2N/7$ distant chirping sources per frequency bin Δfgw=1/T and localize them with ``diffraction-limited'' precision δθ(1/SNR)(λgw/dₚᵤₗₛₐᵣ). Even if the pulsar distances are poorly known, a PTA with F GW frequency bins can still characterize up to (2N/7)(1-1/2F) sources per bin, and the quasisingular pattern of timing residuals in the vicinity of a GW source still allows the source to be localized quasitopologically within roughly the smallest quadrilateral of quiet pulsars that encircles it on the sky, down to a limiting resolution δθ(1/SNR)√λgw/dₚᵤₗₛₐᵣ. PTAs may be unconfused, even at the lowest GW frequencies: in that case, standard analysis techniques designed to detect a stochastic GW background would be incomplete and suboptimal, whereas matched filtering could provide more information and sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyle et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: