Key result
isCGM linked to ~29% lower all-cause hospitalisation risk vs. BGM in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring improve HbA1c and reduce hospitalisations for diabetes-related complications in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes compared to capillary blood glucose monitoring?
Cohort (n=85,186)
Yes
Does intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring improve HbA1c and reduce hospitalisations for diabetes-related complications in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes compared to capillary blood glucose monitoring?
Initiation of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes is associated with improved glycemic control and reduced risks of cardiovascular events and hospitalizations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm reduced hospitalizations.
Aims/hypothesis We assessed the impact of initiating intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) compared with capillary blood glucose monitoring (BGM) on HbA 1c levels and hospitalisations for diabetes-related complications in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Methods This retrospective comparative cohort study included adults with type 2 diabetes who had a National Diabetes Register initiation date for isCGM after 1 June 2017. Prescribed Drug Register records identified subgroups treated with multiple daily insulin injections (T2D-MDI) or basal insulin (T2D-B), with or without other glucose-lowering drugs. The National Patient Register provided data on hospitalisation rates. Results We identified 2876 adults in the T2D-MDI group and 2292 in the T2D-B group with an isCGM index date after 1 June 2017, matched with 33,584 and 43,424 BGM control participants, respectively. The baseline-adjusted difference in the change in mean HbA 1c for isCGM users vs BGM control participants in the T2D-MDI cohort was −3.7 mmol/mol (−0.34%) at 6 months, and this was maintained at 24 months. The baseline-adjusted difference in the change in HbA 1c for isCGM users vs BGM control participants in the T2D-B cohort was −3.5 mmol/mol (−0.32%) at 6 months, and this was also maintained at 24 months. Compared with BGM control participants, isCGM users in the T2D-MDI cohort had a significantly lower RR of admission for severe hypoglycaemia (0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.95), stroke (0.54; 95% CI 0.39, 0.73), acute non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.75; 95% CI 0.57, 0.99) or hospitalisation for any reason (0.84; 95% CI 0.77, 0.90). isCGM users in the T2D-B cohort had a lower RR of admission for heart failure (0.63; 95% CI 0.46, 0.87) or hospitalisation for any reason (0.76; 95% CI 0.69, 0.84). Conclusions/interpretation This study shows that Swedish adults with type 2 diabetes on insulin who are using isCGM have a significantly reduced HbA 1c and fewer hospital admissions for diabetes-related complications compared with BGM control participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathanson et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes on insulin therapies (n=85,186). Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) vs. Capillary blood glucose monitoring (BGM) was evaluated on Hospitalisation for any reason (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67, 0.75, p=<0.001). Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring was associated with a 29% reduced risk of hospitalisation for any reason and lower HbA1c levels compared with blood glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: